15.1. Abstract
15.2. Morphology and a universe of patterns
15.3. Knowledge and Cultural Memory
15.4. The Cultural Memory System (CMS)
15.5. Bibliography
15. Neuronal Pattern Mechanisms and the Semiotic Base
Dr. Andreas Goppold
http://www.noologie.de/symbol16.htm
(URL)
Keywords: biosemiotics, neuronal resonance fields, neuronal
infrastructure, neuronal patterns, morphology
15.1. Abstract
Recent research in biosemiotics corroborates Peirce's
statement that "the universe is pervaded by signs if it doesn't wholly consist
of signs". The present contribution will generalize the semiotic findings into a
general systematics of pattern, after G. Bateson. (A morphology in the
sense of Goethe). The term pattern has recently gained prominence as key
term in understanding mankind's quest to make the universe intelligible, to
fashion a Cosmos from the pure Chaos of the undiscriminate swarm
of photons, electrons, air pressure changes, chemical and physical stimulants,
that organisms are exposed to every instant of their living existence. On this
facility are based not only the sciences, but also human society, and in the
wider sense, life, and the lawfulness of the universe. Gregory Bateson's work is
to be considered as trailblazer in this development. Pattern is the most
general characterization of what an organism's experiential field consists of,
i.e. a mix of impinging inputs registered by its sensory system. What the
organism makes of its sensory input, is again a pattern, at least in animal
life, since it is translated into a neuronal pattern of action potentials and
synaptic connections. G. Bateson coined the name metapattern for
hierarchical higher-order sets of patterns - there must exist some corresponding
neuronal-synaptic pattern for all generated metapatterns. Symbols as used by
humans are metapatterns of the highest order of abstraction, but they are
dependent on the same neuronal infrastructure that is animating all animal life.
A pattern is a Berkeleyan entity because its "existence" is defined as "esse est
percipi". Berkeley's idealistic orientation is averted by the mechanisms of
inter-organismic neuronal pattern coupling / -coherence as described by
constructivist workers following the autopoietic paradigm of Maturana and
Varela. The social coupling of innervated organisms can be described as neuronal
resonance patterns and fields. Such fields extend throughout the temporal
extension of the evolution of the biosphere, the transmission of phylogenetic
and ontogenetic patterns.
15.2. Morphology and a universe of patterns
The term
pattern is a key term in understanding
mankind's quest to make the universe intelligible, to fashion a
Cosmos
from the pure
Chaos of the undiscriminate swarm of photons, electrons,
air pressure changes, chemical and physical stimulants, that organisms are
exposed to every instant of their living existence. On this facility are based
not only the sciences, but also human society, and in the wider sense, life, and
the lawfulness of the universe. (Bresch (1980); Goppold (1999d);
Schunk
(1996); Spengler:
Morphologie der Wissenschaften (1980: 548-553)). Gregory Bateson's work
(1972-1986) is here considered as trailblazer of this development.
Bateson
(1979:
18): We could have been told something about the pattern which connects: that
all communication necessitates context, that without context, there is no
meaning, and that contexts confer meaning because there is classification of
contexts... So we come back to the patterns of connection and the more
abstract, more general (and most empty) proposition that, indeed, there is a
pattern of patterns of connection.
When introducing his famous paradigmatic statement: "
a
pattern that connects", Bateson refers to Goethe as source of inspiration
(1979: 17, 18). Goethe's terms for "the patterns that connect" are
Morphology and
Metamorphosis. Goethe's view was pursued by the
German workers of cultural morphology: Frobenius (Haberland 1973), and Spengler
(1980). In America, a related approach was formulated, via influence of Franz
Boas, by Ruth Benedict, with her famous work: "patterns of culture" (1934). Her
work had in turn influenced Bateson's. (Bateson
1979:
211-212). The Goethean type of
morphology (there are slightly different
versions in many sciences) might be called the
Gestalt tradition of
morphology. Its earlier traces go back to Herder and Vico.
(Straube
1990: 168), (Herder
1975: XVI-XVII), Berg
(1990: 61).
Severi's
(1993: 309, 311-315) description sums up the
essentially holistic and dynamic character of Goethe's conception of morphology.
Severi
(1993:
314): Doch für Goethe ist jeder lebendige Organismus eine Ganzheit, die
nicht auf die Summe ihrer Elemente reduziert werden kann... Diese spezifischen
Formen, die das Reich des Lebendigen charakterisieren, ändern ihre
Gestalten und folgen dabei einer von den Gesetzen der Physik unabhängigen
Logik. Diese Logik kann nur von einer systematischen Morphologie enthüllt
werden..
Riedl describes the obligation of modern biology to Goethe's
work:
Riedl
(1996c:
105): Morphology: since Goethe (1795), the methodology of comparing
Gestalt and to generalize the Typus; the cognitive basis for comparative
anatomy, taxonomy and phylogeny.
Riedl
(1995:
114)...Goethe... tried to understand the principle underlying his ability to
discern pattern.
Riedl
(1995a):
This year, 200 years have passed since GOETHE focused his attention on the path
of discovery the mental/cognitive process which allows us to grasp synthetic
concepts in morphology, comparative anatomy and taxonomy, to justify them and to
estimate their probability. Since this cognitive and epistomological path has
become an indispensable foundation for modern science, we hereby honour the
anniversary with a translation and commentary of this treatise. Key words:
GOETHE, morphology, typus, comparative anatomy, homology,
epistemology.
Stafford Beer describes the essentially observer-dependent
character of pattern:
Stafford Beer, in
(Sieveking
1974, preface): What after all is
order, or something systematic? I suppose it is a pattern, and a pattern has no
objective existence anyway. A pattern is a pattern because someone
declares a concatenation of items to be meaningful or cohesive. The onus for
detecting systems, and for deciding how to describe them, is very much on
ourselves. I do not think we can adequately regard a system as a fact of nature,
truths about which can be gradually revealed by patient analytical research. A
viable system is something we detect and understand when it is mapped into our
brains, and I suppose the inevitable result is that our brains themselves
actually impose a structure on reality.
In his work "Impossibility", John Barrow points out the
universal importance of pattern perception and generation as the foundation of
mathematics, which he describes as the base of the modern exact sciences.
(Barrow
1998: 5-6, 57-58, 89, 190-193):
Barrow (1998: 192): The inevitability of
pattern in any cognizable Universe means that there can exist descriptions of
all these patterns. There can even be patterns in the collections of patterns,
and so on. In order to describe these patterns, we need a catalogue of all
possible patterns. And that catalogue we call mathematics. Its existence
is not therefore a mystery: it is inevitable. In any universe in which order of
any sort exists, and hence in any life-supporting universe, there must be
pattern, and so there must be mathematics.
A definition of mathematics is quoted by (Allot (www)):
"A contemporary definition is that
mathematics is the science of pattern and deductive structure (replacing an
older definition of mathematics as the science of quantity and
space)."
15.2.1. Patterns, Neuro-Aesthetics, and
Neuro-Semiotics
More support for the general principle of pattern (or
paradigm, according to Kuhn 1962) can be found in present neuronal
research of cognition, also called Neuro-Aesthetics, and
Neuro-Semiotics. (Brock (1994), Breidbach (1993-1997)). According to this
recent work, cognitive orientation and action of innervated organisms is
effected by neuronal activation patterns, consisting of oscillation fields and
logical relation structures of neuronal assemblies, treated formally as coupled
dynamic systems and neuronal attractors. These are specifically characterized by
their space-time-dynamics. In the present context, these phenomena are also
called neuronal resonance patterns, and as higher-order hierarchical
aggregates, patterns of patterns: metapatterns. (Volk 1995). Thus,
pattern is the "infrastructure" of neuronal processing happening in our
brains, below, and a few miliseconds before our working
consciousness experiences the "phainomena" and "noumena", the
Gestalten of discernible impressions and thoughts. (Goppold (1999d);
Klages (1981, I: 57-60)).
More WWW material on pattern, meta-morphology, and neuronal
resonance:
http://www.noologie.de/cunni04.htm
(URL)
http://www.noologie.de/desn09.htm
(URL)
http://www.noologie.de/desn17.htm
(URL)
15.2.2. Pattern Transmission Classes:
Phylogenetic and Ontogenetic
Viewed from the most general thermodynamic perspective
(Vernadsky (1930, 1997), Straub 1990), the main characteristic of life is:
the activity of self-replicating dissipative structures, to maintain their
patterns against the entropic force of dissolution, to propagate them, and to
evolve them to greater complexity. This view has in an earlier version
already been formulated by Spinoza (Hoffmeyer (1996: 138)). The genetic material
transmitted in the organisms of the biosphere can be abstracted as a "Pattern
Transmission Class" defined by the laws of the
phylogenetic transmission as
spelled out in molecular genetics. The present formulation derives from
statements of various workers: Prigogine (1984); Straub (1990);
Schrödinger
(1946: 68-75) ch. VI: "Order,
disorder and entropy"; Frei Otto
:
"Naturverständnis" (1985: 30): "Jede lebende Ordnung ist der Tendenz zur
Destruktion abgewonnen."; Tipler (1994: 282-296).
Biosemiotics (Sharov) interprets the events taking place in
the biosphere (Hofkirchner 1997, Vernadsky 1930, 1997) under the aspect of sign
exchanges between organisms (aka the Semiosphere: Hoffmeyer 1997, Lotman 1990)
and within their bodies (Endosemiotics: Posner 1997: 464-487). In his overview
article on biosemiotics, Thure v. Uexküll describes the health of an
organism with the fluent and efficient integration and functioning of all the
multitudinous communication activities of all its subsystems on and across all
hierarchical levels, and he defines illness as deviation from this communicative
"communion" (Uexküll 1997, 454).
In the diction of Maturana and Luhmann (1993), social systems
and proto-social systems arise in the behavioral coupling of organisms, which is
another way of looking at the Semiosphere. The Semiosphere is thus another name
for all behavioral pattern transmissions of the biosphere. In the case of
organisms with higher neuronal systems, like mammals and birds, the behavioral
coupling is effected by Neuronal Resonance. In the diction of Pattern
Transmission Classes, this is the realm Ontogenetic Transmission, of learned
behavior between organisms, most notably between parent and child
generations.
15.2.3. 15.2.3. Spatio-Temporal
Perspective: The Ordering of Pattern Transmission Classes
"Our virtues lie in the interpretation of
the time."
(Shakespeare, Coriolanus, IV, 7.)
If we take the stance of a temporal perspective view, looking
back into the past, we can discern the following order of pattern transmission
classes which can be arranged, cum grano salis, in a logarithmic scale of
factor-ten steps (except the last one):
Related material on the WWW:
http://www.noologie.de/desn09.htm
(URL)
15.2.4. The Event Landscape - A
Perspective over Time
Using a term by Paul Virilio (1998), the above perspective
view can be called an Event Landscape. It is like the view from a high
mountain, as that related by Petrarca 1335 on the summit of Mt. Ventoux (Gebser
1973: 38-45), or that related in the Bible in Matth 4,3-11 and Luc. 4,3-13. It
is the grand panorama over the history of the universe, of which Heraklit said
in B 64: ta de panta oiakizei Keraunos. It is a perspective that can
rightly only be enjoyed by God, because it is too good for us mere mortals.
Virilio (1998):
Für Gott ist die Geschichte eine Ereignislandschaft. Für ihn gibt es
keine Abfolge, weil alles gleichzeitig da ist... Diese nur schwer vorstellbare
transhistorische Landschaft erstreckt sich über alle Zeitalter hinweg, von
einer Ewigkeit bis zur anderen. Und dieser kaum denkbaren Zone entspringen seit
Anbeginn der Zeit die Generationen, die sich durch ihren beständigen Wandel
gegen den Horizont einer ewigen Gegenwart abzeichnen... Eine Zeitlandschaft, in
der die Ereignisse unversehens an die Stelle der
Oberflächengestalt... treten, in der
Vergangenheit und Zukunft aus ein und derselben Bewegung hervorgehen und ihre
Gleichzeitigkeit offensichtlich zutage tritt.
15.2.5. 15.2.5. The Eye on the Pyramid as
Symbol of Temporality and Orientation
The Event Landscape re-appears in that famous symbol
which appears on every US One-Dollar bill: The Eye on the Pyramid. (This
is interpreted here in a different meaning than what the Freemason influenced US
founding fathers had in mind). The following are the distinctive phases of human
temporal orientation:
A: The Present - The "Now" - The Cogent Moment (Salthe
1985, 1993)
The Present is the focus of all existence. We cannot
act and think but in the Now, and also Memory, the mental
projections of a Past, and Expectation, the projections of a
Future, can only happen in the present moment. In German, the Now
is called "der Augen-Blick", which again leads us back to the old
symbolism. In neurological terms, the Now is governed by a temporal
coherence function spanning about three seconds: "the three second
consciousness" (Pöppel 1993).
B: The Past
B1: Personal Memory
B2: Collective Ontogenetic / Cultural Memory
B3: Phylogenetic Memory, Genetic Heritage,
Instincts
C: The Future: The Expectation
D: The Forgetting, Death, Dissolution of Memory
15.2.6. The Neo-Ptolemaic Geospheric
embedding of Pattern Transmission Classes
According to Vernadsky and his
succes
sors, we can alternatively picture this
embedding in a geospheric projection scheme (Vernadsky
(1997: 26), Vernadsky
(1930)). This scheme is, of
course, patterned after the old Ptolemaic cosmology.
(Spengler
(1980: 621); Spektrum d. Wissenschaft, Jan.
1993, p. 84: "Schädelsche Weltchronik von 1493"; Lippe (1997: 181, 187)).
In Lippe's work, we also find an elaboration of how the ancient conceptual
patterns repeat or recur in modern intellectual history.
(Cosmo- (Iono- (Strato- (Atmo- (Hydro- (Litho-
(Geo-sphere)))))))
(Bio-sphere)
Since the Biosphere is primarily water based, it can be
viewed as an extension of the Hydrosphere. It contains the following
sub-spheres:
(Bio- (Oiko- (Semio- (Anthropo- (Ethno- (Noo-
sphere)))))
In this view, the Oikosphere is just another aspect of
the Biosphere, namely its view from the "inter-organic" domain, ie.
the mainfold of all (energetic, material, chemical...) connections and relations
of all organisms with all others. The Semiosphere is the mainfold of
all sign exchange processes of all organisms. The Anthroposphere is
defined after (Gumilev (1987: 360)):
"In this perspective mankind is regarded as
a certain covering of the planet Earth or as part of the biosphere... the
anthroposphere... the biomass of all people together with the products of their
activity... domestic animals, cultivated plants... the anthoposphere is ... a
mosaic [consisting of] ... collections of persons."
The
Ethnosphere is the mainfold of all human cultural
patterns after Gumilev
(1990: 175), and the
Noosphere is the mainfold of all higher human symbolic activities.
(Vernadsky
(1997: 155),
Hofkirchner
(1997)).
15.3. Knowledge and Cultural Memory
In the world of day-to-day pragmatic requirements, and of
sheer survival,
knowledge is that essence of hard-won experience and
learning which has been handed down not only through the countless generations
of human ancestry, but also in the organic genetic lineage right from the very
start of life, about 3-4 billion years ago. Knowledge is an aspect of the more
general phenomenon of
memory. Cassirer (1960: 68-69) cites Hering:
"Memory is to be considered a general function of all organic matter." Bateson
thematizes this in his metalogue on instinct (1972: 38-58). Knowledge is an
aspect of
Cultural Memory (CM), as described in the works of
Assmann&Assmann (1983-1993), Bergson (1919), Connerton (1989), Halbwachs
(1985), Harth
(1991).
15.3.1. Cultural patterns as immortality
complexes
Dennett
(1990) points out one
essential property of cultural patterns (which he calls memes): they are
potentially immortal.
Dennett
(1990):
Memes, like genes, are potentially immortal, but, like genes, they depend on the
existence of a continuous chain of physical vehicles, persisting in the face of
the Second Law of Thermodynamics. [material carriers]... tend to dissolve in
time. As with genes, immortality is more a matter of replication than of the
longevity of individual vehicles... Brute physical replication of vehicles is
not enough to ensure meme longevity... for the time being, memes still depend at
least indirectly on one or more of their vehicles... a human
mind.
(Wright
1994:
157): The only potentially immortal inorganic entity is a gene (or, strictly
speaking, the pattern of information encoded in the gene, since the physical
gene itself will pass away after conveying the pattern through replication).
In the present study, cultural patterns are said to form
immortality complexes. Cultural patterns share this property with the
genetic patterns of the DNA molecules, which Dawkins
(1976) had therefore awarded the attribute "The Selfish Gene". Whether such a
character trait can at all be attributed to some otherwise quite harmless
strings of nucleotic acid, is a discussion for which this is not the place. The
observation is indeed, that the patterns of life forms have enjoyed a fairly
good constancy as long as our cultural memory will attest to (the rhinocerosses,
antelopes, bisons and horses in Altamira and other caves look pretty much the
same as they do now) (Anati
1991), and what
comparisons of fossil bones with those of presently living species can tell us.
Within the cultural memory of humanity, we can also conclude,
that certain cultural patterns have endured for a very long time indeed: The
Australian Aboriginal rituals, which are, to the claim of the Aboriginals
themselves, tens of thousands of years old (Strehlow
1947-1971), and the rites of the major religions of the world that are one to
several thousand years old, the Vedic and Parsee:
Staal
(1982), (1986), (1989), the Jewish:
Assmann
(1992: 196-255), and the Christian
(Encarta
: Christianity), and Islam
(Encarta
: Islam, Muhammad). And, as we see from the
example of ritual, these patterns depend in their transmission from the past
into the future on the humans to perform (enlive) them. A central aspect of
cultural memory could be characterized as:
CM is that of the personal
memories which doesn't die with the person who is dying. Since cultural
patterns are also the cultural memory, we thus come to the
pact or
bargain (pistis) that is being struck between the mortal humans as living
agents in the transmission of the (potentially) immortal patterns: the humans
can gain a piece of that immortality for themselves. In this way, we can
re-interpret the significance of those very old and venerable rituals that the
most long-lived traditions of humanity have upheld during all those millennia.
To be a transmitter of cultural patterns is a virtual equivalent of an
"Alternative to the immortality of the Soul".
15.4. The Cultural Memory System (CMS)
The Cultural Memory System (CMS) is the systematic theoretical
account of those processes and structures by which the
Cultural Memory CM
arises and operates.
[44]
15.4.1. The dual perspectives of the CMS
The CMS can be viewed from two different perspectives, which
are dual aspects of the same
phenomenon,
[45]
much as
wave and
particle are dual aspects of the same physical
phenomenon:
1. the Cultural Memory (CM) view, of the individual
humans, and
2. the Cultural Pattern (CP) view, the intersubjective
aspect.
The Cultural Memory view
ad 1.: In the
Cultural Memory view, the CMS refers to
those processes and structures by which personal subjective memory material
is exchanged between individuals and across generations and made available on an
intersubjective basis. It is the
diachronic aspect of
Cultural
Transmission.
[46]
In
ethnological diction, it is the
emic view, and philosophically, it is
based on
intentionality. From the subjective viewpoint, it is that
faculty by which one individual can {reference to / learn from / participate in}
the memory content of (an)other individual(s), even without direct personal
contact, e.g. when they live in a distant place, or in the distant past.
The starting point for the concept of
Cultural Memory
are the works by Aleida and Jan Assmann
(1983-1992),
Cassirer
(1954-1985), Yates
(1989, 1990), Connerton
(1989), and
Halbwachs
(1985). References on memory:
Schmidt
(1991), Harth
(1991), Norman
(1970-1982),
Bergson
(1919), Heinz v.
Foerster
(1985: 133-172) "Gedächtnis ohne
Aufzeichnung", Johnson
(1991),
Illich
(1988: 14-28).
The Cultural Pattern view
ad 2.: in the Cultural Pattern view as intersubjective
position, it is called the culture pattern replicator system, those
processes and structures by which cultural patterns are maintained,
exchanged, and transmitted in populations (synchronic) and across
generations (diachronic). In ethnological diction, it is the etic
view. The cultural pattern view is here called a morphology, in the sense
that morphology is a theoretical tool for the study of pattern {maintenance /
replication / perception} in the most general sense. Related material
under:
Douglas (1970: 11): A symbol only has
meaning from its relation to other symbols in a pattern. The pattern gives the
meaning. Therefore no one item in the pattern can carry meaning by itself
isolated from the rest.
15.4.2. The basic typology of CMS:
somatic and extrasomatic factors, sensory modalities
The typology of CMS has to account for the different
ways and means by which CM is manifested, maintained or stored, and transmitted.
The most basic distinction is according to
1. somatic and
2. extrasomatic factors.
ad 1.: Somatic Factors are those concerning CM as an
affair of the human memory, and the human body and its facilities, the nervous
system, the brain, the sense organs and sensory modalities, etc. Another
term used in this context is incarnat/-ed/-ion, for: factors bound in
the bodily flesh. A further basic differentiation can be made into the
different impressive and expressive sensory modalities available
to the human body.
ad 2.: Extrasomatic Factors are those of the
intersubjective domain, or of the external media, here also called the
Cultural Memory Media CMM. All communication between organisms takes
place through some medium. The primary medium is the body, and in performative
modes, without material storage, as in dance or song, there is the physical
medium of air, light, or sound, between the sender and receiver. The various
types of CMM can be classed according to their technical and informational
properties, and along the line of the sensory modalities.
15.4.3. Extrasomatic factors: the
typology of Cultural Memory
Media
(CMM)
In the most general sense, the
Cultural Memory
Media CMM is that aspect of the CMS that can in any way be observed from the
intersubjective position, the
extrasomatic aspect of the CMS. The concept
of medium is further treated in Böhme-Dürr
(1997), Posner
(1997: 228-229). More references with
many types of CMM in semiotic categories: Posner
(1997), and Noeth
(1985). The research of SFB 511
(Sonderforschungsbereich Literatur und Anthropologie, Universität Konstanz)
maintains a large database on CMM research (SFB-511
1995).
Static vs. performative CMM
The Cultural Memory Media (CMM) can then be classed into
static and material vs. performative and dynamic
ones:
The static CMM are those involving a (more or less)
enduring carrier material.
The performative CMM, also called ephemeral or
dynamic.
Before the introduction of technological media like film,
audio recording, and computerized multimedia, the material CMM allowed only
static representations. Writing is the best known and most widely used
application of such static CMM. The overt and covert influences of this factor
of stasis in material CMM is of prime importance for the present
study.
Cultural Memory Technology: CMT
The Cultural Memory Technology CMT: systematic use of
static material extrasomatic devices (CMM) specifically for transmitting CM.
Writing is the prime Cultural Memory Technology of civilizations.
A table view of the main types of cultural memory media
The typology of CMM can be shown in a diagrammatic ordering
according to those main categories:
I. verbal language
oriented
[47]
II. non-verbal language oriented
and
a. using markings in/on material storage, with more or less
permanent material substrates, static
b. performative based on human-to-human transmission,
ephemeral, and dynamic
This classification can be mapped in a table serving as a
general coordinate system for overall orientation and overview. It leaves out
the different sensory modalities which will be treated in the next subsection.
We can diagram it in the following way:
The term "oral" tradition is used in quotation marks, as the
term is used in the literature for many different, not only verbal, non-written
transmissions. The following systematic will provide a more detailed
classification. The element of
ritual is drawn as to intersect the
categorical ordering, as it does in real life. In common use, ritual is usually
multimedial, with acted performance, and often with song, music and dance as
dominant elements. Hanna
(1979: 198),
Aquili
(1979). Discursive prosa speech, the recording
of which is the main purpose of writing, is not the most important element in
ritual (Staal
1986: 252). Ritual is placed partly
outside the CMM ordering grid, since it transcends the categorization. It
indicates primary CMS mechanisms that are deeper than what can be conveyed with
the semantic content of spoken prosa language, and which will lead into areas
where we cannot tread with the alphabet.
Noeth
(1985:
350-351): Nonverbale Kommunikation erweist sich hier nicht als Alternative oder
Ergänzung zur Sprache, sondern als ein der Sprache semiotisch
überlegenes Ausdrucksmedium.
The general classification of the spectrum of CMM
Another display of the different categories of CMM can be made
in a more detailed hierarchy mode, and by further combining the four main
categories with the different sensory / somatic modalities.
Sensory / somatic modalities
1. Auditive
2. Visual
3. Kinesthetic
4. Tactile
5. Olfactory (smell)
6. Taste (gustatory)
Non-specific somatic modalities
7. Para- (non-) senses
8. Electro / magnetic
9. Existential
Cross product of Modalities and CMM
Combined with the different modalities, we arrive at the
spectrum of CMM:
1. verbal language oriented, material carrier, visual,
color-insensitive
1.1. writing (phonographic, non-phonographic)
1.1.1. phonographic writing: non-alphabetic
1.1.2. phonographic writing: alphabetic
1.1.3. non-phonographic writing (pictographic, iconic,
ideographic, logographic, etc.)
2. verbal language oriented, performative, auditive
2.1. "oral" tradition
2.1.1. epic poetry, laws, prayers, oaths
2.1.2. folk tradition: fairy tales, myths, riddles, jokes,
insults, swear words, spells
3. verbal language oriented, various modes
3.1. material carrier, tactile
3.1.1. Braille (Encarta: Braille),
Noeth
(1985: 364-365)
3.2. performative, auditive, non-vocal
3.2.1. drumming and whistle "language"
(speech-surrogates)
3.3. performative, visual
3.3.1. sign languages, Noeth
(1985:
280-291)
4. non-language oriented, material carrier
4.1. visual color-insensitive
4.1.1. operational symbolic: mathematical, engineering
4.1.2. abstract symbolic: e.g. music, and dance scripts
4.1.3. geometrical, pictorial, diagrammatic, iconic, technical
drawing
4.1.4. non-semantic, symbolic: ornament
4.2. visual color-sensitive
4.2.1. pictorial: painting
4.2.2. abstract: Inca quipu and other Amerind
CMM
4.3. tactile
4.3.1. craft traditions
4.3.2. Inca quipu, numeric knot systems, rosary
4.4. olfactory (smell): perfumery
4.5. gustatory (taste): cooking
4.6. mixed-mode, and non-classified
4.7. media technologies, Multimedia, 4d (moving, changing)
displays
4.7.1. visual media technology
4.7.2. auditive media technology
4.7.3. other sensory modality media technology
5. non-language oriented, performative
5.1. gestic
5.2. tactile
5.2.1. massage
5.2.2. torture
5.2.3. marital (sexual) arts
5.4. kinesic:
5.4.1. dance
5.4.2. martial arts
5.4.3. marital (sexual) arts
5.4.4. gymnastics
5.5. auditive: music, rhythm, drumming
6. multimedial forms, ritual
15.5. Bibliography
Allott, Robin (www): Biological bases of mathematics,
http://www.percep.demon.co.uk/biomath.htm
(URL)
Anati
, E.: Felsbilder, Bär,
Zürich (1991)
Aquili
, d', E., Laughlin, C.,
McManus, J. (eds.): The Spectrum of Ritual, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
(1979)
Assmann
, A.; J. (Hrg.): Schrift und
Gedächtnis, Wilhelm Fink, München (1983)
Assmann, J.; Hölscher, T.: Kultur und Gedächtnis,
Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M (1988)
Assmann, A.; J.: (Hrg.): Weisheit, Wilhelm Fink, München
(1991a)
Assmann, A.; Harth, D. (Hrg.): Kultur als Lebenswelt und
Monument, Fischer, Frankfurt/M (1991b)
Assmann, A.; Harth, D. (Hrg.): Mnemosyne, Fischer, Frankfurt/M
(1991c)
Assmann, J.: Das Kulturelle Gedächtnis, Beck,
München (1992)
Assmann, A.: Exkarnation - Zur Grenze zwischen Körper und
Schrift. In: Huber, J., Müller, A. (eds.): Raum und Verfahren, Zürich,
p. 133-155 (1993)
Barrow, John D.: Impossibility, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
(1998)
Bateson
, G., Ruesch J.:
Communications, Norton, New York (1968)
Bateson, G.: Steps to an ecology of mind, Chandler,
(1972)
Bateson, G.: Mind and Nature, a necessary unity, Dutton,
(1979)
Bateson, Gregory; Bateson, Mary Catherine: Angels fear,
Bantam, NY (1986)
Benedict
, R.: The patterns of
culture, Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1934)
Berg
, E.: Johann Gottfried Herder,
in Marschall, p. 51-68 (1990)
Bergson, Henri: L'energie spirituelle, P.U.F., Paris
(1919)
Breidbach, Olaf: Expeditionen ins Innere des Kopfes, Thieme,
Stuttgart (1993)
Breidbach, Olaf; Rusch, Gebhard; Schmidt, Siegfried, (Hrsg.):
Interne Repräsentationen, Suhrkamp (1996)
Breidbach, Olaf (Hrsg.): Natur der Ästhetik -
Ästhetik der Natur, Springer, Wien (1997)
Bresch, Carsten: Muster und Evolution, in: Studien zur
Klassifikation, Bd. 9, 1980, p. 109-128, Indeks, Frankfurt (1980)
Brock, Bazon, Breidbach, Olaf: Neuronale Ästhetik, Zyma
Art Today, 2 (1994)
Cassirer
, E.: Philosophie der
symbolischen Formen, I, II, III, Bruno Cassirer, Oxford (1954)
Cassirer, E.: Wesen und Wirkung des Symbolbegriffs, Wiss.
Buchges., Darmstadt (1959)
Cassirer, E.: Was ist der Mensch?, Kohlhammer, Stuttgart
(1960)
Cassirer, E.: Symbol, Myth, and Culture, Yale Univ. Press, New
Haven (1979)
Cassirer, E.: Symbol, Technik, Sprache, Meiner, Hamburg
(1985)
Cassirer, E.: Zur Logik der Kulturwissenschaften, Wiss.
Buchges., Darmstadt (1994)
Connerton
, Paul: How societies
remember. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge New York Port Chester
(1989)
Dennett
, D.: Memes and the
Exploitation of Imagination, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 48,
127-35, Spring (1990)
WWW:
http://www.tufts.edu/as/cogstud/papers/memeimag.htm
(URL)
Foerster, Heinz von: Sicht und Einsicht, Vieweg, Braunschweig
(1985)
Gebser
, J.: Ursprung und Gegenwart,
DTV, München (1973)
Goppold, A.: Neuronal Resonance and UI Technology,
(1997a)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol12.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: The Symbolator Project: Multimedia Systems for
Envisioning Dynamic Mental Images, forthcoming
(xxxx)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Projekt Multimedia-Diskurs
(1998)
http://www.noologie.de/diskur.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: The Ethics of Terminology and the new Academic
Feudalism, Proceedings of TKE '99, 23-27.8.1999, TermNet, Vienna
(1999a)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol09.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Balanced Phi-Trees: The Hierarchy and Histio-logy
of Noo-logy, in: H.P. Ohly (ed.): ISKO '99, Hamburg 23.-25.9.1999, Ergon Verlag,
Würzburg
(1999b)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol14.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Hypertext as a practical method for balancing the
Hierarchy and Histio-logy of Noo-logy, in: H.P. Ohly (ed.): ISKO '99, Hamburg
23.-25.9.1999, Ergon Verlag, Würzburg
(1999c)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol15.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Design und Zeit: Kultur im Spannungsfeld von
Entropie, Transmission, und Gestaltung, Dissertation, Univ. Wuppertal, 1999,
(1999d)
http://www.noologie.de/desn.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Spatio-Temporal Perspectives: A new way for
cognitive enhancement, HCI International '99, München, August 22-27, 1999,
in: Bullinger, H.-J., Ziegler, J. (eds): Human-Computer Interaction: Ergonomics
and User Interfaces, Vol I, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, p. 476-480,
(1999e)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol10.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Time Factors in Interface Design for Augmenting
Human Intellect, in: Bullinger, H.-J., Vossen, H. (eds): Adjunct Conference
Proceedings, HCI International '99, München, August 22-27, Fraunhofer IAO,
Nobelstrasse 12, 70569 Stuttgart, p. 87-88,
(1999f)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol11.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Neuronal Pattern Mechanisms and the Semiotic
Base, "Sign Processes in Complex Systems", 7th International Congress of the
IASS-AIS, Dresden, Oct. 3-6, w.e.b. Universitätsverlag Dresden, Bergstr.
78, 01069 Dresden, (1999g)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol16.htm
(URL)
Goppold, A.: Neuronal Resonance Fields, Aoidoi, and Sign
Processes, "Sign Processes in Complex Systems", 7th International Congress of
the IASS-AIS, Dresden, Oct. 3-6, w.e.b. Universitätsverlag Dresden,
Bergstr. 78, 01069 Dresden, (1999h)
http://www.noologie.de/symbol17.htm
(URL)
Gumilev, Lev: Ethnogenesis and the Biosphere, Progress, Moskau
(1990)
Haberland, E. (ed.): Leo Frobenius: 1873 - 1973; an anthology,
Steiner, Wiesbaden (1973)
Halbwachs
, M.: Das Gedächtnis,
Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M
(1985)
Hanna
, J.L.: To Dance is human,
Univ. of Texas Press, Austin (1979)
Harth, D.: Die Erfindung des Gedächtnisses, Keip,
Frankfurt/M (1991)
Herder
, J. G.: Sprachphilosophische
Schriften, ed. Erich Heintel, Meiner, Hamburg (1975)
Hoffmeyer, Jesper: Signs of meaning in the universe, Indiana
Univ. Press, Bloomington, (1996)
Hoffmeyer, Jesper: The Global Semiosphere, 5th IASS congress
in Berkeley, June 1995. In: Irmengard Rauch and Gerald F. Carr (eds.): Semiotics
Around the World. Proceedings of the Fifth Congress of the International
Association for Semiotic Studies. Berkeley 1994. Berlin/New York: Mouton de
Gruyter (1997), pp. 933-936.
Hoffmeyer, Jesper: Semiosis and biohistory: A reply, Semiotica
120-3/4 (1998), 455-482
Hofkirchner, Wolfgang (ed.): Vernadsky, Vladimir I., Der
Mensch in der Biosphäre, zur Naturgeschichte der Vernunft, Lang,
Frankfurt/M (1997)
Illich, I.: Fortschrittsmythen: Schöpferische
Arbeitslosigkeit oder Die Grenzen der Vermarktung, Rowohlt, Reinbek
(1978)
Illich, I.: Schulen helfen nicht: über d. mythenbildende
Ritual d. Industriegesellschaft, Rowohlt, Reinbek (1980)
Johnson
, G.: In den Palästen
der Erinnerung, Droemer Knaur, München (1991)
engl: In the Palaces of
Memory
Klages, L.: Der Geist als Widersacher der Seele, Bouvier, Bonn
(1981)
Kuhn, Thomas S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,
Chicago (1962)
Lippe, Rudolf z.: Neue Betrachtung der Wirklichkeit, Europ.
Verl. Anst., Hamburg (1997)
Lotman, Y. M.: Universe of the mind: a semiotic theory of
culture, Tauris, London (1990)
Luhmann, Niklas: Soziale Systeme: Grundriß einer
allgemeinen Theorie, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M. (1993)
Marschall
, W. (ed.): Klassiker der
Kulturanthropologie. Beck, München (1990)
McClain, Ernest: The Myth of Invariance. The Origin of the
Gods, Mathematics and Music from the Rg Veda to Plato, Shambala, Boulder &
London (1978)
:= The Pythagorean Plato
Noeth
, W.: Handbuch der Semiotik,
Metzler, Stuttgart (1985)
Norman, Donald A.: Models of human memory, New York
(1970)
Norman, Donald A.; Lindsay, Peter H.: Human information
processing , New York (1972)
Norman, Donald A.: Explorations in cognition, San Francisco
(1975)
Norman, Donald A.: Memory and attention, New York
(1976)
Norman, Donald A.: Perspectives on cognitive science,
Cognitive Science Society, Norwood, NJ (1981)
Norman, Donald A.: Learning and memory, San Francisco
(1982)
Otto, Frei (ed): Naturverständnis, SFB 230, Heft 3, Univ.
Stuttgart (1985)
Peirce
, C.S.: The collected papers
of Charles Sanders Peirce, Hartshorne, Weiss, Burks, eds., Harvard Univ. Press,
Cambridge (1931-1958);
the citation scheme is according to standard usage as
CP [vol].[paragraph]
Pöppel, Ernst (1993). Das Drei-Sekunden Bewußtsein.
Psychologie Heute. 10/93, S. 58-63
Popper
, K.: Die Logik der
Sozialwissenschaften, Kölner Zeitschr. f. Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie
14 (1962)
Posner
, R.: What is culture? Toward
a semiotic explication of anthropological concepts. in: Koch W.A. (ed.): The
Nature of Culture, Brockmeyer, Bochum, p. 240-295 (1989)
Posner, R. (ed.): Warnungen an die ferne Zukunft, München
(1990)
Posner, R. (ed): Semiotik: ein Handbuch zu den
zeichentheoretischen Grundlagen von Natur und Kultur, de Gruyter, Berlin
(1997)
Pyta-www: www sites with Pythagoreanism
materials
http://www.heise.de/bin/tp/issue/tp.htm
(URL)?artikelnr=2624&mode=html
http://magna.com.au/~prfbrown/welcome.html
(URL)
http://members.aol.com/areoasis/Reviews/pythagoras.html
(URL)
http://www.aros.net/~eriugena/pita.htm
(URL)
Radwan, Jon: Musical Semiosis: Active form and social being,
Symposion: "Signs, Music, Society", International Association for Semiotic
Studies IASS-AIS, Waltergasse 5/1/12 - A-1040 Vienna, March 12-14,
(1999)
Riedl, R.: Biologie der Erkenntnis, Paul Parey, Berlin
(1980)
Riedl, R.: Die Spaltung des Weltbildes: biolog. Grundlagen des
Erklärens u. Verstehens, Parey, Berlin (1985)
Riedl, R.: Die Ordnung des Lebendigen, Piper, München
(1990)
Riedl, R.: Goethe and the Path of Cognition: An Anniversary.
In: Evolution and Cognition, Vol. 1, No. 2, p. 114-120 (1995)
Riedl
R.: "Goethe and the Path of
Discovery: An Anniversary".
(1995a)
http://www.kla.univie.ac.at/Journal.html
(URL)
Riedl, R.: Cognition of evolution: can causal explanation
overrule cognition? In: Evolution and Cognition, Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 88-107
(1996c)
Salthe, S.: Evolving hierarchical systems, Columbia Univ.
Press, New York (1985)
Salthe, S.: Development and evolution, MIT Press, Cambridge
(1993)
Schmied-Kowarzik, W., Stagl, J.: Grundfragen der Ethnologie,
Reimer, Berlin (1993)
Schmidt, S. J. (ed.): Gedächtnis, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M,
(1991)
Schrödinger, E.: What is life? Cambridge Univ. Press,
Cambridge (1946)
Schunk, Axel; Hägele, Peter: Auf der Suche nach Ordnung,
Univ. Verlag Ulm, Ulm (1996)
Semiotica
, Special issue on
paleosemiotics, Vol. 100-2/4 (1994)
Semiotica, 120-3/4 (1998), Reviews of Hoffmeyer 1996
Severi, C.: Struktur und Urform, in: Schmied-Kowarzik, p
309-330 (1993)
SFB-511.: Antrag auf Einrichtung eines
Sonderforschungsbereichs "Literatur und Anthropologie", Universität
Konstanz, Konstanz (1995)
http://www.sfb511.uni-konstanz.de/
(URL)
Sharov:
http://www.gypsymoth.ento.vt.edu/~sharov/biosem/welcome.html
(URL)
Sieveking, G., Longworth, I., Wilson, K.: Problems in economic
and social archeology, Westview, London (1974)
Spengler, O.: Der Untergang des Abendlandes, DTV, München
(1980)
orig. C.H. Beck, 1923
Staal, F.: The science of ritual, Bhandarkar Oriental Research
Inst., Poona (1982)
Staal, F.: The fidelity of oral tradition and the origins of
science, in: Mededelingen der koninklijke Nederlands Akademie van Wetenschappen,
afd. Letterkunde, Deel 49 - No 8, North-Holland, Amsterdam p. 249-288 (1986)
Staal, F.: Rules without meaning, Lang, New York,
(1989)
Stonier, T.: Beyond Information : the natural history of
intelligence, Springer, London (1992)
Stonier, T.: Information and the internal structure of the
universe: an exploration into information physics, Springer, London (1994)
Straub, Dieter: Eine Geschichte des Glasperlenspiels,
Birkhäuser, Basel (1990)
Straube, H.: Leo Frobenius, in: Marschall, p. 151-170
(1990)
Strehlow, T.: Aranda Traditions, Melbourne Univ. Press,
Melbourne (1947)
Strehlow, T.: Personal monototemism in a polytotemic
community, in: Haberland, E., Schuster, M., Straube, H.: Festschrift f. Ad. E.
Jensen, Renner, München, p. 723-754 (1964)
Strehlow, T.: Songs of central Australia, Angus and Robertson,
Syndey (1971)
Tipler, Frank: Die Physik der Unsterblichkeit, Piper,
München (1994)
Uexküll, Thure v.: Biosemiose. In: Posner (1997), p.
447-456
Vernadsky, Vladimir I.: Geochemie in ausgewählten
Kapiteln, Akad. Verl.-Ges., Leipzig (1930)
Vernadsky, V: The Biosphere, Springer, New York
(1997)
Virilio, Paul: Ereignislandschaft, Hanser, München
(1998)
Volk, T.: Metapatterns, Columbia Univ. Press, New York
(1995)
Wright, R.: The moral animal: evolutionary psychology and
everyday life, Pantheon, New York (1994)
Yates, Frances: The Art of Memory, Routledge&Kegan, London
(1966)
[44] See also:
http://www.noologie.de/desn18.htm
(URL)
[45] See also: Luhmann
(1993: 292)
[46] See also: Spengler
(1980: 738-738)
[47] S
poken verbal
language in this sense: as everything consisting in the production of
certain patterns of sounds, which we call
words that can be written down
with an alphabet.